Monday, May 18, 2009

"Henry Corbin & American Poetry"

Tom Cheetham recently wrote on Robert Duncan's interest in Persian scholar Henry Corbin. It's great to see a web space devoted to Corbin's work which, via Olson and Duncan, helped influence the projective aims of Black Mountain. I've always found Corbin's scholarship helpful in articulating how thought and perception can be precisely valued--and that the history of how we think and feel has roots in competing traditions of thought and bodies of spiritual feeling. It's been a while since I've read Corbin, but Cheetham links to an article I wrote several years ago that discusses how the New Americans applied some of Corbin's study to their own pursuits. Here's a snippet:

Persian scholar Henry Corbin wrote extensively on the active intelligence of Medieval Islamic philosophy and spiritual practice, particularly in Avicenna and the Visionary Recital. In Arabic it's 'aql fa''al, the Tenth Intelligence, uniting light and darkness, matter and language. In that sense it's part of a complex medieval angelology, a system of reading signs and their spiritual correspondences. For Duncan, Charles Olson and others it has to do with the activation of language in the self, a kind of self-actualization by the word. An active intelligence in poetry is one that quickly apprehends the relations of things, ideas and emotions without explaining or playing games with words. It's a unifying intelligence that does not rest, abiding by an intuitive curiosity. There are emotional and instinctive intelligences, physical ones too (like Newton's law of gravity!). But the active intelligence is engaged with the reading of images and the mediation between self and other through them. Related to it is ta'wil, a spiritual or esoteric exegesis that turns thought back on its origin in language and the world.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Might have been apropos for Ron S., in his link to the Corbin site, to have mentioned the prominent focus the author there gives your Corbin/Duncan essay! Maybe he just didn't see it.

Kent

Dale said...

Kent, thanks. Yeah, who knows? You know Ron--busy with all those links. He probably just didn't see it.

Meg said...

The rigorous attempts to define and redefine such things by academics and the like....establishing angelogies, morphologies of the mind.....what more could go wrong!



Alas....the trek is long and the mountain is high.

Peace

Dale said...

Ah, Meg, I can always count on you for helpful insights....

Meg said...

You can. I enjoy your blog...one of the few I regularly visit...my time is so limited. Full time nurse you know...wake up at 4 or so, coffee, smoke, check into Silliman, Possum, sometimes Nada or maybe even my own blog, heh.

The point here is that it is a bit frustrating when the scholars most cited are not muslim scholars. You'd think folks would rely on physicists for their physics but no!

It's nice that some people feel it is a worthwhile exercise i.e. the cultural study of Islam i.e. Orientalists and the like. But all the same, I wouldn't relay it to another as "gospel".

The funny thing about Islam and the mythological pursuits....is..that it is very rich in that sort of thing.

But you have to realize...we take it seriously, not as a mythology that can be dissected by non adherents...no. But there will be those whose only understanding of it will be on the mythological level. Worse yet, they think they've hit the top and we have no idea!

So yes. You can count me as one of your readers and an appreciative one at that.